Archive for the 'Economy' category

The Basis of Our Whole Life…

April 10, 2010 12:34 pm

There is a bit of advice given to us by the ancient heathen Greeks, and by the Jews in the Old Testament, and by the great Christian teachers of the Middle Ages, which the modern economic system has completely disobeyed. All these people told us not to lend money at interest; and lending money at interest–what we call investment–is the basis of our whole system. Now it may not absolutely follow that we are wrong. Some people say that when Moses and Aristotle and the Christians agreed in forbidding interest (or ‘usury’ as they called it), they could not foresee the joint stock company, and were only thinking of the private moneylender, and that, therefore, we need not bother about what they said. That is a question I cannot decide on. I am not an economist and I simply do not know whether the investment system is responsible for the state we are in or not. This is where we want the Christian economist. But I should not have been honest if I had not told you that three great civilizations had agreed (or it seems at first sight) in condemning the very thing on which we have based our whole life.

~C.S. Lewis; Mere Christianity, Social Morality

  • Mere Christianity
    Mere Christianity
    Author: C. S. Lewis
  • Where do we live?
  • What is modernity?
  • What is post modernity?
  • What is our life composed of?

Perhaps in the midst of a global economic meltdown we can begin an honest appraisal of the realities of our modern existence. To call ourselves “post modern” without ever reckoning with the substance of modernity seems like an exercise well beyond foolishness.

Post modernity in the simplest of definitive terms is that which comes after modernity. If we cannot begin to honestly name the attributes (for good and for bad) of modernity, who are we to ever judge that we have now escaped beyond modernity?

This I believe is the best question to emerge not from the post moderns, but from the critics of the post moderns who would assume to have jumped beyond the tired rationality of modern thought and into a blissful world of the amorphous future present.

And so, what should be our response? Should we blow our brains out along with Tyler Durden as we simultaneously watch the credit card companies implode upon the dynamite of our own cultural acquiescence?

Man, I see in fight club the strongest and smartest men who’ve ever lived. I see all this potential, and I see squandering. God damn it, an entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars. Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don’t need. We’re the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War’s a spiritual war… our Great Depression is our lives. We’ve all been raised on television to believe that one day we’d all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won’t. And we’re slowly learning that fact. And we’re very, very pissed off.

~Tyler Durden, Fight Club

  • Fight Club
    Fight Club
    Director: David Fincher

Maybe when we are tired of punching and scraping at our imaginary selves such exhaustion will prepare us for repentance and baptism?

1In those days John the Baptist came, preaching in the Desert of Judea 2and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near.” 3This is he who was spoken of through the prophet Isaiah:
“A voice of one calling in the desert,
‘Prepare the way for the Lord,
make straight paths for him.’ “[a]

4John’s clothes were made of camel’s hair, and he had a leather belt around his waist. His food was locusts and wild honey. 5People went out to him from Jerusalem and all Judea and the whole region of the Jordan. 6Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan River.

7But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to where he was baptizing, he said to them: “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? 8Produce fruit in keeping with repentance. 9And do not think you can say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. 10The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.

11″I baptize you with[b] water for repentance. But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. 12His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor, gathering his wheat into the barn and burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”

~Matthew 3:1-11

Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake…

April 14, 2009 9:48 pm

A friend of mine and I were recently having a conversation in which the following commonplace proverb seemed to describe the situation well…

You can’t have your cake and eat it too.

Crumbs
>
 
>
 
>

I believe the context of our conversation had something to do with the auto industry and the current global economic crisis.

Our profound musings amounted to something like this; you can’t have responsible spending and excessive profits at the same time. If people figure out that they do not need a new car every 3 years, then you don’t need as many cars, and there will not be as much profit to be made in the auto industry.

We both knew what we meant as we nodded in agreement to the saying, but somehow the adage did not quite have the punch we were demanding of it… it seemed so easily disproved. By the experience of attending any single birthday party or wedding, this bit of proverbial admonishment can be quickly undone; indeed people have cake and eat it all the time.

So we did what any responsibly confused 21st century thinkers guided by curiosity and technology would do, we Wikipediaed it (now a real word, you can Wiktionary it here), and discovered the supposed original ordering of the saying yields a much more profound statement.

Translated to modern english from the original 1546 record, the idiom should read…

You can’t eat your cake and have it too.

It took nearly 300 years for the wording to get turned around, but once done it may be impossible to restore it to its original power.

The phrase’s earliest recording is from 1546 as “wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?” (John Heywood’s ‘A dialogue Conteinyng the Nomber in Effect of All the Prouerbes in the Englishe Tongue’) alluding to the impossibility of eating your cake and still having it afterwards; the modern version (where the clauses are reversed) is a corruption which was first signaled in 1812.

Subtle refinements of language have a tendency to remove their potency over time. I am reminded of C. S. Lewis’s discussion of the loss of meaning in the term “Gentlemen”, which at one time was reserved for property owners, then was slowly turned into men of noble regard, then further digressed into “guys that are nice”, and now it can be loosely applied to anyone who enters a strip club.